Summary of Experience — Fillable Form

"On a £25m high-rise residential refurbishment programme, the RIBA Stage 2 cost plan exceeded the client's funding envelope by approximately £3.2m. I led a cost-driven design review, comparing the specified unitised curtain walling against a render-and-masonry hybrid on a whole-life basis. I advised the client that the hybrid reduced capital cost by around £2.6m while lowering the projected 30-year maintenance liability, and recommended reallocating part of the saving to fire-safety upgrades that carried a higher risk priority. The design team adopted the recommendation and the scheme returned to budget without compromising the client's investment objectives."

"On an HS2 enabling-works package, I was responsible for the bills of quantities measured under CESMM4. I identified that the draft measurement allocated significant temporary-works risk to admeasurement, exposing the client to open-ended cost. I advised the client to measure the earthworks and temporary support elements on a defined-quantity basis supported by a clear risk register, rather than provisional quantities, and prepared a comparison demonstrating the cost-certainty benefit. The revised approach reduced the client's risk exposure on the package by an estimated £1.8m and was adopted as the standard measurement basis for subsequent packages."

"On a phased infrastructure programme, the client's cashflow forecast showed a funding shortfall in Year 2 driven by front-loaded contractor payment profiles. I analysed the payment mechanism and advised the client to renegotiate to milestone-based payments aligned to verified progress, and to introduce a forecast-to-complete reporting discipline. I recommended a revised drawdown schedule that deferred around £4m of expenditure into the funded period without delaying the works. The client adopted the strategy, avoided an emergency funding request to its board, and the programme proceeded on its original timeline."

"On a high-rise residential remediation scheme, the original specification proposed a full façade replacement. Drawing on my understanding of the cladding build-up and the building's ventilation strategy, I advised the client that a targeted replacement of the non-compliant insulation and cavity barriers — retaining the compliant outer leaf — would achieve regulatory compliance at materially lower cost and disruption. I prepared a cost-and-risk comparison of the two approaches and recommended the targeted solution subject to fire-engineer sign-off. The client accepted the advice, saving approximately £1.9m and reducing the programme by four months while meeting Building Safety Act requirements."

"During a final-account negotiation, I identified that a contractor's claim included costs I believed had already been recovered under an earlier compensation event. The client's project lead pressed me to certify the full sum to preserve the relationship. Applying the RICS Rules of Conduct — in particular the duty to act with integrity and not to mislead — I advised the client in writing that certifying a sum I could not substantiate would breach my professional obligations, and recommended an independent reconciliation of the two claims. The reconciliation confirmed a £160,000 duplication. I advised a without-prejudice approach to resolve it, protecting the client's funds and the professional relationship."